Cyber Security
Security Practitioners Should Work Towards Preserving Users’ Privacy As Much As Possible

Jonathan Fischbein, CISO, Check Point Software Technologies, speaks about how data security and compliance has changed over the past year
How has the need for data security and compliance changed over the past year?
Over the past year, the “new norm” workspace expanded the organization’s perimeter. Going forward into 2021, remote work and distributed workspaces are a new reality. The need for data security and compliance was predominant as organizations had to recalibrate their cybersecurity approach around securing their corporate networks and data centers, cloud environments, and employees wherever they are. With remote work as the new standard and organisations working on multi-cloud environments, we had to make sure that all the developers and teams accessing very confidential assets such as source codes for customer PII (Personally Identifiable Information), ERP systems or financial information, etc. did not go out of the organization.
Technologies such as VDI (virtual desktop Infrastructure) together with several other security solutions are adopted to make sure that the exchange of data and information from home is secured. The use of collaboration tools has also escalated rapidly. Organizations have switched to using collaboration tools such as Zoom, Teams, and Slack more than ever before. These collaboration platforms which are an extension of an organisation on-premise infrastructure, are completely in the public cloud.
To make sure that the confidential information is secured and protected from being exposed in these environments, we had to implement SASE security or extend the CASB solutions to make sure that only the relevant people with Multi-Factor Authentication are logging in and are able to access the information.
What are the best practice standards and frameworks that can help companies achieve and maintain data security and compliance?
There are plenty of best practices, but the question is first of all how can we implement a best practice that is going to scale and be unified across the entire organization. It is not feasible to implement best practice standards and frameworks separately for each different sector within an organisation. It has to be simple. If a security policy or a solution framework is not easy to follow, it will become a major obstacle. Cyber attackers will find ways to elude and bypass it which is a very big problem.
Adopting the Data loss protection (DLP) best practice is extremely important in making sure that all information going out is filtered. Secondly, making sure that all files by default are encrypted in ways such that any member of the organization can access it, but if unwittingly that information is sent to an external 3rd party, they should not be able to access it. There are many different ways by which important data can fall into the wrong hands.
For instance, what about USB keys, are we blocking or encrypting USB keys by default? This is something very necessary that many people are improvident about. All of this together will add compliance and if someone is not compliant, they need to be held responsible. The security policy within an organisation should be respected and followed by everyone. To ensure this, there should be regular monitoring and audits conducted, and if something is not right, a root cause analysis should be conducted to find out the cause and prevent it from happening in the future.
Are there any regional data compliance regulations and frameworks, which companies that handle large amounts of public data need to follow?
Every country has its own legislation and set of regulations which are dynamic and are reformed through continuous efforts to improve it. There are many data protection laws and legislations that are put in place to secure and safeguard the protection of data and privacy within the country. Besides the regional regulations and compliance, there are also several other well-known certifications and frameworks that cybersecurity vendors or organizations operating in the cloud or other security-specific areas have to comply with.
For instance, for delivering SaaS services, we have to comply with SOC 2 framework which is a specific certification for organizations to ensure that such services are as secure as they should be. There are other standards and frameworks such as NIST, ISO 27001 or 27015, etc. which help organisation to increase the reliability of their security systems and make sure that they comply with the best practices. Talking about the public cloud, we use it as an extension of our data center.
We need to have compliance checks on this process of digitalization and adoption of the cloud. As we move the information and important data into the public cloud, we need to also add to the security to ensure that this environment is secured. There is also a necessity to maintain compliance checks and monitor it on a regular basis. This is an important part of our daily operations at Check Point Software Technologies which requires us to focus on compliance checks on GRC and infosec best practices internally as well.
What according to you are the five tips that companies need to follow to comply with data security regulations.
First of all, I would say map the challenge right. If the mapping is done in the right way then you will know exactly what is where and will be able to tackle the problem. This is very significant on the public cloud when it is not sure how dynamic or extending it is, in that case, the battle will be lost before it even starts. The second one is to make sure to understand the security controls that are already in place. As cyber-attacks become increasingly evasive, more controls are added, making security more complicated and tedious.
The next important thing is to implement the security policies that are relevant and can be met. For example, it is not possible to implement security controls of military-grade to a regular organisation, it has to be relevant and there should be a balance. Other than this, there is also a need to make sure that the security policy does not become an obstacle and allows people to work successfully, knowing that security is present on the side but does not cause an obstruction.
And lastly, it is very important to make sure that all of the regulations such as SOC 2 and PCI, etc., and many other such certifications and regulations are updated. We know that in every country legislation and regulations are changing so it is necessary to make sure that the security teams are up to date with this.
Many countries have passed their own version of data protection laws recently. How does your company help its clients with securing the data and staying compliant?
In every country or every region, there are different data protection acts and laws which are evolving and improving with time. For securing the data and staying compliant, we need to go back and see how the platforms are built. Almost every organization has adopted cloud computing to varying degrees within their business. However, with this adoption of the cloud comes the need to ensure that the organization’s cloud security strategy is capable of protecting against the top threats to cloud security.
The most challenging thing that we are dealing with in the public cloud. We have to make sure that all the important information and confidential customer data are secured and protected. The customer also has the right to be forgotten after a certain period of time, for example after a given duration of time the customer data is no longer used and is omitted or deleted. For things like opt-out or opt-in, for instance, a customer does not want anyone on the SaaS service to be able to access their data, they can opt-out. These are things that are the key drivers for making sure that the services are compliant and they also dictate its security.
At Check Point Software, a major part of our focus is around securing this environment and making sure that we comply with all the standards and frameworks and also the regional regulations with respect to the different countries.
Do you believe the line between data security and data privacy has started to blur?
The security teams within an organisation are eligible for accessing certain information and data when there is a need for a necessary investigation to be carried out or if there is something really suspicious, only when such information is accessed after the permission of the legal team. In the last six months or since covid there is a huge awakening of ransomware attacks. Besides backup as mitigation, there are also certain security solutions such as the Check Point Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), which is an endpoint detection and remediation tool and especially an anti-ransomware solution that detects if there is a ransomware attack going on.
Such technology checks everything that is happening on the endpoint and the security teams can see the logs and processes on the endpoint device. So there is a certain area that it’s getting into privacy but on the other hand, we also need to be able to ensure security against ransomware attacks, so there is a huge challenge here. We need to be very gentle and very transparent about what we do and how we do it and keep the trust of our users, customers, partners, and employees, by taking special care about their privacy and communicating with the teams and customers, because trust is something that can be lost very easily in the data privacy and security world. Therefore the answer is yes, the area is very grey and the security practitioners work towards preserving the user’s privacy as much as possible.
Cyber Security
Positive Technologies Discovery Leads D-Link to Recommend Router Replacements

Vladimir Razov, an expert from the PT SWARM team, has discovered a vulnerability in several models of D-Link routers. According to Mordor Intelligence, D-Link is one of the top three Wi-Fi router manufacturers in the world. The vendor has been notified of the threat in line with the responsible disclosure policy and recommends that users switch to more recent devices.
The vulnerability, which is registered as BDU:2024-06211 with a CVSS 3.0 score of 8.4, affects the following D-Link models: DIR-878, DIR-882, DIR-2640-US, DIR-1960-US, DIR-2660-US, DIR-3040-US, DIR-3060-US, DIR-867-US, DIR-882-US, DIR-882/RE, DIR-882-CA, and DIR-882-US/RE. At the time of the research, vulnerable routers could be discovered using search engines in the United States, Canada, Sweden, China, Indonesia, and Taiwan.
According to the manufacturer, these models are no longer supported. D-Link recommends retiring the outdated devices and replacing them with supported devices that receive firmware updates. “If this vulnerability is successfully exploited, a malicious user authorized in the router’s web interface can compromise the entire device and gain access to all traffic passing through it,” says Vladimir Razov, Web Application Security Analyst at PT SWARM, the offensive security department at Positive Technologies.
As a temporary measure to mitigate the threat, Vladimir Razov recommends using OpenWrt (an open-source embedded operating system based on the Linux kernel and designed specifically for routers) or changing the login credentials for accessing the router’s web interface. Previously, Positive Technologies helped address vulnerabilities in Zyxel routers and other Zyxel devices. Positive Technologies also enhanced its PT Industrial Security Incident Manager (PT ISIM) with an additional expertise pack, enabling cybersecurity teams to detect attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in MikroTik routers and Cisco switches.
Cyber Security
Sophos Study: MDR Users Claim 97.5% Less in Cyber Insurance

Leading cybersecurity provider Sophos has released findings from a new study quantifying the financial impact of various cybersecurity controls on cyber insurance claims. The research compares the effect of endpoint solutions, EDR/XDR technologies, and MDR services on claim amounts, offering valuable insights for both insurers and organizations.
Sally Adam, Senior Director, Solution Marketing at Sophos, said, “Every year, organisations spend huge amounts of money on their cybersecurity. By quantifying the impact of controls on the outcome of cyberattacks, this study enables them to focus their investments on the most cost-effective options. At the same time, insurers have a major influence on cybersecurity spending through the controls they require of organisations wishing to be covered and the discounts they offer when a given scheme is in place. This study enables them to encourage investments that can make a real difference to incident outcomes and the resulting claim amounts.”
The Sophos study reveals a dramatic difference in cyber insurance claims: organizations using MDR services claim a median compensation of just $75,000, a staggering 97.5% less than the $3 million median claimed by organizations relying solely on endpoint solutions. This means that endpoint-only users typically claim 40 times more in the event of an attack. The study attributes this significant reduction to the rapid threat detection and blocking capabilities of MDR services, which can effectively prevent extensive damage.
The study also highlights a clear benefit to combining EDR or XDR with endpoint solutions, as the average insurance claim for users of these tools is just $500,000, which is one-sixth of the $3 million average claim for those using only endpoint solutions.
The Sophos study indicates that the predictability of cyber insurance claims varies significantly depending on the security controls in place. Claims from organizations utilizing MDR services show the highest predictability, suggesting consistent and reliable threat mitigation. This is likely due to the 24/7 expert monitoring, investigation, and response that allows for swift action against threats at any time. Conversely, claims from users of EDR/XDR tools are the least predictable, implying that their effectiveness in preventing major damage heavily depends on the user’s expertise and speed of response.
The Sophos study also reveals significant differences in recovery times from ransomware attacks. Endpoint solution users average a 40-day recovery, while EDR/XDR users take the longest at 55 days. In stark contrast, organizations using MDR services recover the fastest, with an average downtime of just three days. These findings underscore MDR’s effectiveness in minimizing the impact of cyberattacks and highlight the less predictable recovery experiences associated with EDR/XDR tools, whose success is dependent on user expertise.
Adam concludes, “The research confirms what many people instinctively know: the type of security solution used has a significant impact on cyber insurance claims. Cyberattacks are inevitable, but defences are not. These results are a useful tool for organisations wishing to optimise their cyber defence and their return on investment in cybersecurity. They will also be useful for insurers looking to reduce their exposure and offer suitable policies to their customers.”
Cyber Security
Fortinet Strengthens OT Security for Critical Infrastructure

Fortinet has enhanced its OT Security Platform to better protect critical infrastructure from modern cyberthreats. The upgraded platform offers more than basic OT visibility with the new FortiGuard OT Security Service, expanded hardened solutions for network segmentation and 5G in demanding environments, and an improved OT SecOps portfolio for automated threat response and compliance management.
“Fortinet has been building an industry-leading OT Security Platform for 20-plus years and remains at the forefront of OT security innovation,” said Nirav Shah, Senior Vice President, Products and Solutions at Fortinet. “As cyberthreats against critical infrastructure and across industries such as energy, transportation, and manufacturing continue to grow, Fortinet remains committed to delivering comprehensive security solutions tailored for operational technology environments. These latest enhancements give organizations the tools they need to improve their OT security posture and adhere to regulatory requirements—all managed through a single, unified platform.”
The latest Fortinet OT Security Platform enhances OT security with:
- Advanced Threat Protection: New FortiGate Rugged NGFWs combined with the enhanced FortiGuard OT Security Service offer superior security enforcement, detecting threats using over 3,300 OT protocol rules, nearly 750 OT IPS rules, and 1,500 virtual patching rules. This protects against known exploited vulnerabilities and provides virtual patching for older OT systems. Secure remote access is also improved with updates to FortiSRA, including enhanced secrets and password management.
- Secure Segmentation: The new FortiSwitch Rugged 108F and FortiSwitch Rugged 112F-POE industrial-grade switches enable precise security control at the port level, preventing unauthorized lateral movement within OT networks. Built on Fortinet’s unified FortiOS, these switches simplify network and security management.
- Resilient Connectivity: Two new ruggedized 5G solutions are introduced: the IP67-rated FortiExtender Rugged 511G for secure, high-speed connectivity to remote OT sites, and the IP64-rated FortiExtender Vehicle 511G for fleet vehicles. Both feature embedded Wi-Fi 6 and new eSIM capabilities for easier carrier selection.
- Enhanced OT SecOps: Fortinet’s AI-driven security operations capabilities are strengthened with updates to FortiAnalyzer 7.6 and FortiDeceptor 6.1, offering deeper threat insights and simplified compliance reporting for OT security teams. FortiNDR Cloud now includes OT protocol support for threat hunting, while FortiNDR (on-premises) adds features like a Purdue Model view and a device inventory covering OT and the Mitre ATT&CK ICS Matrix.
The Fortinet OT Security Platform delivers a unified view and comprehensive security tools to simplify the management of OT and remote site security. It empowers organizations to easily assess, secure, and report on risks, including meeting complex regulatory compliance. Fortinet uniquely offers seamless segmentation and a complete ruggedized portfolio of OT security solutions all managed by a single operating system, FortiOS. Its deep integration within the Fortinet Security Fabric makes it a leading platform in the industry, providing an effective, efficient, and holistic approach to OT security and compliance that surpasses standard offerings.
-
Artificial Intelligence1 week ago
89% of Companies Update AI Data Strategies, But Gaps Remain
-
News1 week ago
Matrix Announces IoTSCS-ER Compliant Network Cameras Certified by STQC
-
Cyber Security1 week ago
Halcyon Launches 24/7 Ransomware Detection and Recovery (RDR) Solution
-
Artificial Intelligence1 week ago
UiPath Acquires Peak to Drive Next-Gen AI Decision Intelligence
-
Artificial Intelligence1 week ago
Kaspersky Detects Sophisticated Scam Using DeepSeek AI
-
Cyber Security1 week ago
Forcepoint to Acquire Getvisibility
-
Cyber Security1 week ago
Group-IB Outs High-Tech Crime Trends Report 2025 for META
-
Market Research1 week ago
ICS/OT Cybersecurity Budgets Lag as Attacks Surge, Exposing Critical Infrastructure Risks